Risks

The risks data poisoning creates, and the evidence

Poisoned data can leave a system that passes its tests yet misbehaves when a hidden trigger appears. The evidence so far comes from research, not from a named incident.

Last reviewed against Anthropic, UK AI Security Institute and arXiv. Sources

No single breach sits behind this site. The risk is a class of attack that researchers have shown to be practical, and that OWASP and NIST now describe in their guidance [4] [5]. Judge it as you would any weakness in a supply chain: by what you depend on and who can touch it.

Database stack, monitor showing code, document and cloud download arrow beside a green padlock

Hidden behaviour

A backdoor that stays quiet

OWASP says backdoors can stay dormant until a specific trigger activates them, which makes them hard to test for [4]. In the Hackaday report on a medical study, poisoned models were not readily caught by the standard benchmarks used to test such systems [9].

What this means for assurance

A pass on routine tests is not proof that the training data was clean. Treat benchmark results as one input, not a clearance.

Low cost

Less control needed than assumed

The 2025 study found that the count of poisoned documents mattered, not their share of the data [1]. For the 13 billion parameter model, 250 documents were about 0.00016% of training tokens [1]. An earlier paper said about 0.01% of two web-scale image datasets could have been poisoned for about $60 [8].

Read the limits too

The study authors note that attackers still face practical barriers, such as getting poisoned content into a training set [1].

Routes in

Where tampered data enters

OWASP lists the points where data can be altered: pre-training, fine-tuning and embedding [4]. Its example scenarios include falsified documents supplied for training and weak filtering that lets injected content through [4].

Check these as well:

  • Models downloaded from public repositories, which OWASP says can carry malicious code that runs on loading [4]
  • Datasets crawled from the web or built from snapshots of crowd-edited pages [8]
  • Third-party data vendors whose collection methods you have not checked [4]
  • Retrieval and embedding stores fed from outside content [4]
Factory buildings linked through a hub to a phone showing a fingerprint and shield

Real consequences

Wrong outputs in serious settings

The medical study reported that replacing about 0.001% of training tokens with misinformation produced models that often gave erroneous medical statements [9]. For a UK organisation the exposure depends on what the system decides or advises: the more consequential the output, the more the integrity of the data matters. Read the medical study guide for detail.

Safe with a green shield and tick beside it

Next step

Reduce what you can

The prevention guide and the detection guide set out controls drawn from OWASP and the NCSC.

Key facts

Data Poisoning in brief

What it is
Manipulating pre-training, fine-tuning or embedding data to add weaknesses, backdoors or bias[4]
Documents needed
250 poisoned documents backdoored every model tested[1]
Models tested
600 million to 13 billion parameters[3]
Share of training data
About 0.00016% for the 13 billion parameter model[1]
Web-scale datasets
About 0.01% of LAION-400M or COYO-700M poisoned for about $60[8]
Medical study
0.001% of training tokens replaced with misinformation[9]

How CyPro can help

Need a hand planning for this?

Understanding the change is one job. Working out what it means for your systems, your suppliers and your roadmap is several more. CyPro's consultants can take any of them on.

Security lead advising a board

Fractional CISO for the board

A senior security lead who advises the board on what to fix first, what to accept and what to tell customers, and owns the decision record.

More on cypro.co.uk
Cyber security consultants planning hardening work

Hardening and segmentation

Our consultants put the controls in place that limit the damage when something is missed: firewall rules, network isolation and tighter admin access.

More on cypro.co.uk
Penetration tester probing an application for weaknesses

Penetration testing

A focused test of your systems and the controls around them, so you know they hold before an attacker finds out for you.

More on cypro.co.uk
Scanner checking internet-facing systems for weaknesses

Vulnerability scanning

Find every internet-facing system you run, including the forgotten ones, and see which are still on a vulnerable build.

See the scanning service
Security analysts monitoring systems around the clock

24/7 security monitoring

Our SOC analysts watch your systems day and night for the signs of an attack in progress: unexpected processes, new outbound connections, logins that do not fit.

More on cypro.co.uk
Incident responders containing an attack

Incident response

If you may already be compromised, our responders contain it, preserve the evidence, find out what was touched and get you running again safely.

More on cypro.co.uk
Rocket launching from a cloud

Plan ahead

Want a plan for your organisation?

Defending against data poisoning starts with knowing which AI systems you run, where their data comes from and who owns the risk. CyPro can help set the governance, risk assessment and controls around that.